hostfranchise.blogg.se

Arturia v collection 4 vs 5
Arturia v collection 4 vs 5




arturia v collection 4 vs 5
  1. #ARTURIA V COLLECTION 4 VS 5 FULL#
  2. #ARTURIA V COLLECTION 4 VS 5 SOFTWARE#

Even if you were to strip it of all historical context and remove the nostalgia factor, you'd still be left with a powerful, multi-engine digital synth capable of going toe-to-toe with any of its contemporary plug-in rivals. Whether the Synclavier is faithful to the original or not is almost beside the point here anyway. The combination of additive and FM synthesis approaches opens up a world of timbral complexity, and the Synclav's deep editing capabilities allow for the creation of highly detailed sounds with a whole lot of movement. While we've not been lucky enough to spend sufficient time with an original Synclavier in order to judge how close the plug-in's behaviour is to that of its forebear, there's no doubt that sonically the Synclavier V is absolutely on point.Įven the most cursory scroll through the plug-in's presets demonstrates the huge range of rich and sonically complex sounds the synth can create from retro-sounding leads to gorgeous digital strings, glistening pads and ominous, soundtrack-ready drones. NED co-founder Cameron Jones - who wrote the original's OS - has been brought on board to assist with creation of the emulation.

#ARTURIA V COLLECTION 4 VS 5 FULL#

"Sonically the Synclavier V is absolutely on point and can create a huge range of rich and complex sounds."Īrturia's take on the Synclav focuses purely on the synth elements of the original, foregoing the more workstation-like features in favour of replicating the full FM and additive engines and expanding on the capabilities of both. As a result its sound is quintessentially '80s, instantly bringing to mind classic soundtracks and the bold, polished sound of early synth pop.

arturia v collection 4 vs 5 arturia v collection 4 vs 5

Unsurprisingly the Synclav was very expensive - and is even more so vintage - but it still made its way into the studios of many notable pop producers and soundtrack composers. The original Synclavier was a direct competitor to the Fairlight CMI, which combined sampling and sequencing with additive and FM synthesis into a huge proto-workstation that required a rack-mounted CPU and its own (at the time hugely-powerful) 16-bit operating system.

#ARTURIA V COLLECTION 4 VS 5 SOFTWARE#

I await others.Certainly the most exciting of the new additions is the Synclavier V, a software recreation of New England Digital's hugely powerful digital synthesizer from the late-'70s/early-'80s. It's cool and warm at the same time and I know that makes no sense but it's audio so adjectives. It's not new but I do really like the Solina and diving under the hood for cool textures, pads and stuff. I'm not really a preset guy but for these types of plugs it's nice to hit some starting points so I think the browser improvement is a pretty big deal and a time saver in The Land Of A Thousand Patches. But yeah no, for now anyway.Ģ nice improvements though are new preset browsers with categories etc and resizable GUI's. Maybe they need some deep tweaking or I chose bad presets. EDIT- does anyone remember Camel Audio Cameleon 5000? This one will definitely get in that additive synth zone.Ĭalling up a couple of the acoustic and Rhodes piano presets I thought they both sounded horrible- hey you asked. I'm watching some tutorial vids so I can get a bit of a grasp on programming the thing.

arturia v collection 4 vs 5

I dig FM even in my modular synth world so yeah it's pretty cool. Wow- the Synclavier FM sure sounds different than a DX7! I used to sell DX7 sounds back in its day.






Arturia v collection 4 vs 5